Claims

Treatment teachers showed relatively high fidelity to the ECHOS model, with adherence and quality scores increasing slightly from mid-year to year end

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Fidelity observation scores averaged 8.5 for adherence and 7.9 for quality at mid-year on a ten-point scale, rising to 8.8 and 8.6 by year end. → Brown 2013

Evidence

Brown 2013

Brown, J. A., Greenfield, D. B., Bell, E., Juárez, C. L., Myers, T., & Nayfeld, I. (2013). Early Childhood Hands-On Science Efficacy Study. SREE Spring 2013 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563045

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Museum staff observed treatment teachers in winter and spring using the ten-item ECHOS Fidelity Observation Tool, which measures adherence to the ECHOS model (5 items) and quality of implementation (5 items) on a three-point rubric (0 = low, 1 = medium, 2 = high).

"at mid-year, fidelity observation scores averaged 8.5 for adherence and 7.9 for quality on a ten-point scale, and by the end of the year, scores had increased slightly to 8.8 for adherence and 8.6 for quality"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.