The review reports that a blended learning model contributed more to high school students' biology achievement than traditional teaching methods¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the study the review attributes to Yapici and Akbayin (2012), the blended learning model contributed more to students' biology achievement than traditional teaching methods. → Suprabha. K 2015

Evidence¶

Suprabha. K 2015¶

Suprabha. K, & Subramonian, G. (2015). Blended learning approach for enhancing students learning experiences in a knowledge society. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098578

q2 · i? · review · r1

The review reports, citing Yapici and Akbayin (2012), a study of the effect of a blended learning model on high school students' biology achievement, in which "the blended learning model contributed more to the students' biology achievement than Traditional teaching methods". No effect size is printed.

"Yapici, I. U., and Akbayin, H. (2012), have studied the effect of blended learning model on high school students' biology achievement and on their attitudes towards the internet. Their research results revealed that the blended learning model contributed more to the students' biology achievement than Traditional teaching methods."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Blended learning or flipped classroom models may combine e-learning and traditional modalities — related
• Blackboard-based blended teaching produced significantly higher academic achievement than traditional teaching, with η² = 0.75 — a broader claim this one bears on
• Simulation-based biology teaching produced significantly higher post-test success scores than traditional teaching methods for education students. — related