Undergraduates in a blended learning environment achieved significantly higher self-directed learning post-test scores than students in two traditionally taught control groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Self-directed learning post-test scores of the experimental blended group differed significantly from both control groups, while the two control groups did not differ from each other. → Uz 2018

Evidence¶

Uz 2018¶

Uz, R., & Uzun, A. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 877-886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Kruskal-Wallis comparison of self-directed learning post-test scores across the three groups gave chi-square = 9.304, p = .01; Mann-Whitney U follow-ups showed experimental vs Control 1 (p = .013) and experimental vs Control 2 (p = .007) significant, Control 1 vs Control 2 not (p = .655).

"Table 9 reveals that the difference between the self -directed learning post -test scores of the experimental group and the two control groups were found statistically significant. The difference between self -directed learning post -test scores of the two control groups was not statistically significant."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Undergraduates in a blended learning environment achieved significantly higher self-regulated learning post-test scores than students in two traditionally taught control groups — related
• Saudi EFL preparatory students taught through a blended e-learning approach for 8 weeks outperformed a traditionally taught control group on an achievement test — related
• The tablet e-textbook experimental group significantly outperformed the traditionally taught control group on the post-test — related