Claims

Blogging did not improve student performance on tests and examinations once student ability was controlled in one experimental study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Cameron's study of 170 Economics students using a class blog, student performance in tests and examinations was not correlated with blog participation after controlling for student ability. → Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Evidence

Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Carlos R. del Blanco, Ivan García-Magariño. (2018). The use of blogs in the education field: A qualitative systematic review. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05421

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review reports Cameron's study of 170 Economics students using a class blog for discussions, with academic tests and examinations as data. The review states "student perf ormance in tests and examinations was not correlated with blog participation on ce that student ability was controlled".

"Although students generally perceived posit ive feelings regarding the blog usage, the results indicated that student perf ormance in tests and examinations was not correlated with blog participation on ce that student ability was controlled."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.