Claims

Web 2.0 technologies (wikis and blogs) show a positive, moderate pooled effect on academic performance (E++ = 0.740) across 19 quasi-experimental studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 The random-effects pooled effect size of wiki and blog interventions on academic performance is 0.740 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.320-1.161, which the authors classify as moderate. → Ergul Sonmez 2021

Evidence

Ergul Sonmez 2021

Ergul Sonmez, E., & Cakir, H. (2021). Effect of Web 2.0 technologies on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.161

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 19 journal-article studies with quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control-group designs, analyzed in CMA software using Hedge's g. The printed pooled effect size is E++ = 0.740 (95% CI 0.320-1.161), which the authors quote as "the effect size (E ++) is 0.740" and classify as middle range per Cohen (1981).

"the maximum limit of 0.215 standard error and 95% confidence interval is 1.161, the lower limit is 0.320 and the effect size (E ++) is 0.740"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.