Claims

Playing mathematical board games at school significantly increased 3rd-grade boys' introjected extrinsic motivation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 Boys who played mathematical games at school scored better on the introjected extrinsic motivation test than control boys (F= 4,160; p ≤ 0,05; η2 = 0,086). → Thomas Rajotte 2016

Evidence

Thomas Rajotte 2016

Thomas Rajotte, Christine Marcotte, Lisa Bureau-Levasseur. (2016). Evaluation of the Effect of Mathematical Routines on the Development of Skills in Mathematical Problem Solving and School Motivation of Primary School Students in Abitibi-Témiscamingue. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(10): 2386-2391. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041017

q2 · i0 · causal · r1

ANCOVA comparing the second experimental group, which played mathematical games two hours per week for two months (N=33), with the control group, reported in Table 4 for boys (df error 44). The article states playing mathematical games has "an important effect on boys introjected extrinsic motivation (η2 = 0,086)".

"Moreover, the results show that boys who play mathematical games at school have better results on the introjected extrinsic motivation test (F= 4,160; p ≤ 0,05)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.