BOPPPS teaching improves learning retention skills compared with traditional teaching¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Two studies with continuous measures revealed significant improvement in learning retention skills in the BOPPPS group (SMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.35–0.93, P < 0.001). → Zhu Jing 2025
Evidence¶
Zhu Jing 2025¶
Zhu Jing, Xiao Heng, Zhou Rui, Gan Xiaochuang, Gou Qitao, Tie Hongtao. (2025). The efficacy of the BOPPPS teaching model in clinical and health education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07274-9
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r1
Random-effects pooling of two studies (141 participants) with continuous learning-retention measures; pooled effect size SMD = 0.64 (95% CI 0.35–0.93), with I² = 0 reported in Table 5.
"In the context of learning retention skills, two studies employed continuous variables, revealing a significant improvement within the BOPPPS group compared to the control group (SMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.35–0.93; P < 0.001; Table 5)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- BOPPPS teaching improves classroom interaction on continuous measures, with a non-significant trend on dichotomous measures — related
- BOPPPS teaching significantly improves final examination scores compared with traditional teaching in undergraduate clinical and health education — related
- BOPPPS teaching improves learning initiative compared with traditional teaching — related
- BOPPPS teaching improves student satisfaction compared with traditional teaching — related
- BOPPPS teaching improves analytical ability compared with traditional teaching — related
- BOPPPS teaching improves clinical thinking ability compared with traditional teaching — related
- BOPPPS shows no significant improvement in problem-solving or critical thinking skills compared with traditional teaching — related
- BOPPPS effects on self-study ability diverge by measure type: null on continuous, significant on dichotomous measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.