Claims

Student success scores increased in both the traditional and the WhatsApp-supported environments

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The within-subjects measurement (pretest-posttest) main effect on success is significant (F=739.168, p=.000), with mean scores rising in both groups. → Cetinkaya 2017

Evidence

Cetinkaya 2017

Levent Cetinkaya. (2017). The Impact of Whatsapp Use on Success in Education Process. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1163183

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same quasi-experimental study; Table 4 reports control means rising from 3.83 to 11.57 and experimental means from 3.60 to 19.63. The measurement main effect in Table 5 was F=4236.408 with p=.000; no effect size is printed.

"Accordingly, it can be declared that there is an increase in the success of the students learning in both the traditional environment and in the environment which the WhatsApp is use d as a supplemantary technology."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.