Claims

Both RT and regular remedial instruction significantly improved underachievers' oral reading fluency over 15 weeks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within both the experimental and control groups, oral fluency improved significantly from pretest to posttest (paired t-values -15.72 and -7.69, both p<.001). → Chou 2013

Evidence

Chou 2013

Chou, C. (2013). A study on the effectiveness of applying "Readers' Theater" as English remedial instruction for underachievers. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 10(1), 77-103. http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=7773&ctNode=516&mp=1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-tests on one-minute oral reading assessments for 25 experimental and 24 control underachievers; the article reports t-values of -15.72 and -7.69, "both of which reached the .001 significance level." Means rose from 86.40 to 126.40 (experimental) and 87.33 to 103.25 (control).

"This indicates that both experimental and control groups displayed significant improvements in their English fluency following 15 weeks of English remedial instruction."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.