Claims

Underachieving college English students taught with Readers' Theater remedial instruction achieved significantly higher oral reading fluency than control-group peers after 15 weeks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After 15 weeks of remedial instruction, the RT experimental group's oral reading fluency (WCPA M=126.40) was significantly greater than the control group's (M=103.25), t=6.28, p<.001. → Chou 2013

Evidence

Chou 2013

Chou, C. (2013). A study on the effectiveness of applying "Readers' Theater" as English remedial instruction for underachievers. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 10(1), 77-103. http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=7773&ctNode=516&mp=1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental nonequivalent-groups study of 49 freshman English underachievers (25 experimental, 24 control) at a Taiwanese university; one-minute oral reading assessments (160-word passages) measured WCPA pre and post. The independent-samples post-test comparison favored the RT group, with the article reporting "the t -value is 6.28" at the .001 level.

"it is clear from the independent t -test post-test results in Table 4 that the t -value is 6.28, which reached the .001 significance level and indicates that the oral fluency (M=126.40) of the experimental group students is significantly greater than that of students in the control group (M=103.25)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.