Claims

RT remedial instruction did not reduce English learning anxiety more than regular remedial instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test English learning anxiety did not differ significantly between the RT experimental group and the control group (t=.49, not significant). → Chou 2013

Evidence

Chou 2013

Chou, C. (2013). A study on the effectiveness of applying "Readers' Theater" as English remedial instruction for underachievers. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 10(1), 77-103. http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=7773&ctNode=516&mp=1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test of the anxiety scale (Cronbach's alpha .82, adapted from the FLCAS) post-test for the 25 experimental and 24 control underachievers. The article reports the anxiety t-value of .49 "did not reach the .05 level of significance"; equivalence was not tested.

"This indicates that while students in the experimental group displayed higher levels of English self -efficacy and English learning motivation, they did not exhibit significantly differ ent levels of English learning anxiety from students who were not exposed to RT instruction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.