Claims

Both male and female students gained from games-based instruction, though the gain was higher for males

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The authors report gains in mean scores for both sexes under games-based instruction, with the male gain higher than the female gain. → Okpube Nnaemeka Michael 2016

Evidence

Okpube Nnaemeka Michael 2016

Okpube Nnaemeka Michael, Anugwo M. N. (2016). Card Games and Algebra Tic Tacmatics on Achievement of Junior Secondary II Students in Algebraic Expressions. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation in the Discussion section of the quasi-experimental study: "the gain in the mean scores of both sexes" was observed, with the male gain higher. This is an interpretive statement about descriptive gains, not a separately tested effect; no gain statistics are printed for this contrast.

"This is evident by the gain in the mean scores of both sexes, although the gain was higher in the male than the females."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.