Claims

Male students taught algebraic expressions with games achieved significantly higher adjusted scores than female students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among students in the study, the gender effect was significant (F = 80.374, p < 0.05), with males (adjusted mean 79.44) outperforming females (adjusted mean 64.95). → Okpube Nnaemeka Michael 2016

Evidence

Okpube Nnaemeka Michael 2016

Okpube Nnaemeka Michael, Anugwo M. N. (2016). Card Games and Algebra Tic Tacmatics on Achievement of Junior Secondary II Students in Algebraic Expressions. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA of male and female students taught with games and without games (Table 5) showed a significant gender effect (F = 80.374, p < 0.05). Male students had an adjusted mean of 79.44 (SD 8.14, n = 71) versus 64.95 (SD 7.06, n = 65) for females, so "the male students achieved better than their female counterparts".

"From the result in Table 5, the games favored significantly the male students than their female counterparts. That is, the male students achieved better than their female counterparts."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.