Claims

Local and remote students in a BSC did not differ significantly in their perceptions of the efficiency of BSC

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students in the local class and students in the remote class reported no significant differences in perceptions of the efficiency of BSC. → Yang 2019

Evidence

Yang 2019

Yang, J; Yu, H; Chen, NS. (2019). Using blended synchronous classroom approach to promote learning performance in rural area. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103619

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire survey in the two-year BSC project in Ningbo China compared "students in local class and remote class"; no statistically significant difference in perceived efficiency was found. Equivalence was not tested; no effect size is printed.

"there are no significant differences in the perceptions of the efficiency of BSC between students in local class and remote class"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id bsc-no-perception-difference-local-remote
title Local and remote students in a BSC did not differ significantly in their perceptions of the efficiency of BSC
description Local and remote students in a BSC did not differ significantly in their perceptions of the efficiency of BSC
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yang-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.