Availability of CAASPP statewide assessment data changed MiC leadership teams' discussions and appeared to accelerate districts' ability to monitor improvement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Once CAASPP mathematics results became available, district teams grounded discussions in school-level achievement variation, and analysis of common data alongside theories of improvement seemed to accelerate districts' monitoring of improvement activities. → Perry 2019
Evidence¶
Perry 2019¶
Perry, R., Marple, S., & Reade, F. (2019). What accelerates a community of practice? Inflection points that changed the course of the Math in Common Initiative. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. https://www.wested.org/project/math-in-common-evaluation/
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Qualitative evaluation finding from the inflection point 2 section: WestEd prepared district-specific CAASPP data tables and analyses each fall, and data discussions grew from a few hours to daylong sessions. The authors hedge with "seemed to accelerate."
"In the later years of the initiative, the analysis of common sources of data alongside district theories of improvement seemed to accelerate districts' abilities to monitor their improve -ment activities."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Integrating principals into district MiC leadership teams grounded CoP conversations in practice and helped teams interpret school-level achievement data — related
- Principals actively engaged in prioritizing math at their sites were more likely to organize teacher learning time and involve coaches — related
- MiC district achievement on the CAASPP in mathematics generally followed the same statewide pattern from 2015 to 2018, with MiC districts slightly more homogeneous than non-selected districts — related
- Few schools used 5Essentials data for improvement, citing opaque data, principal-focused measures, and lack of district-wide strategy — related
- Leadership coaching partnerships and instructional leadership team collaboration increased schools' capacity to use survey data — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
caaspp-data-accelerated-improvement-monitoring |
title |
Availability of CAASPP statewide assessment data changed MiC leadership teams' discussions and appeared to accelerate districts' ability to monitor improvement |
description |
Availability of CAASPP statewide assessment data changed MiC leadership teams' discussions and appeared to accelerate districts' ability to monitor improvement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — perry-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.