Claims

Ninth grade Thai EFL students' English creative writing scores rose significantly across a one-group time series of CAI based on the TLS method, with no comparison group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a one-group time series (two pretests, then three posttests over 10 weeks of CAI based on TLS), 32 ninth grade Thai EFL students' creative writing scores rose significantly (p = .000); with no comparison group, the rise cannot be attributed to CAI-TLS itself. → Jinajai and Rattanavich 2015

Evidence

Jinajai and Rattanavich 2015

Nattapong Jinajai & Saowalak Rattanavich. (2015). The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction Based on Top-Level Structure Method in English Reading and Writing Abilities of Thai EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n11p231

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Repeated measures ANOVA on writing scores of 32 ninth grade students in a one-group time series design (two pretests, then three posttests; no control or comparison group) found scores rose significantly after CAI-TLS instruction, with the group showing "higher development in creative writing". The two pretests did not differ significantly (p = 1.000), which does not show that scores were flat before instruction, and without a comparison group the study cannot show that CAI-TLS, rather than other teaching or testing over the 10 weeks, caused the rise.

"the comparison of the development in writing indicated that the experimental group registered higher development in creative writing at a .01 level ( = .218, F-statistic = 25.13, p- value = .000)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.