Claims

Teacher candidates most frequently reported critical thinking among personal-development benefits of the online argumentation implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? In qualitative responses, the personal development theme was the most frequent, with critical thinking the largest category within it. → Fettahlıoğlu 2018

Evidence

Fettahlıoğlu 2018

Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Kaleci, D. (2018). Online Argumentation Implementation in the Development of Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2904

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of open-ended interview responses from the experimental group; Table 6 shows the personal development theme at 50% of coded statements, with critical thinking the largest category (frequency 7). The article states the implementation "supports the improvement of teacher candidates’ critical thinking skills the most".

"When teacher candidates’ opinions about the Moodle application supported online argumentation implementation are examined it is identified that the implementation supports the improvement of teacher candidates’ critical thinking skills the most according to Table 5."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.