Internet and computer access problems limited participation in the online argumentation implementation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Limitations (computer problems, internet problems, time) accounted for about 31% of coded opinions, and candidates supported eliminating internet connection problems. → Fettahlıoğlu 2018
Evidence¶
Fettahlıoğlu 2018¶
Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Kaleci, D. (2018). Online Argumentation Implementation in the Development of Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2904
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive analysis of interview responses; Table 6 lists the limitations theme at 30.77% of statements, split between computer problems and internet problems. The article also reports candidates "strongly supported the elimination of internet connection problems to improve the course".
"In the limitations part of the application, it is identified that teacher candidates have computer and Internet access problems especially out of the university and therefore not all the teacher candidates can always follow the Moodle application, as they want."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Access — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Teacher candidates most frequently reported critical thinking among personal-development benefits of the online argumentation implementation — related
- During spring 2020 remote instruction, internet connectivity and hardware/software problems interfered with course participation for large shares of undergraduates — related
- Infrastructure barriers — limited internet speed, connectivity problems and lack of technical support — hinder effective AI use in nursing education institutions — a broader claim this one bears on
- Motivation, internet connectivity, and hardware/software problems were widespread challenges in remote STEM courses — related
- Technical issues (login scanning, internet connectivity, projector setup, and glitches) frustrated students and created a significant barrier to playlist implementation — a broader claim this one bears on
- Infrastructure and access constraints were reported in 18 of 54 studies (33%) as the second higher-order technical limitation category — a broader claim this one bears on
- AI in adult education risks reinforcing existing inequalities via the digital divide, particularly for rural, low-income, and marginalized learners — a broader claim this one bears on
- Technology access problems during the COVID shift were more prevalent among minoritized students and students from lower-income households — related
- Moodle-based online argumentation implementation improved critical thinking disposition of science teacher candidates compared with a control group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.