Claims

Internet and computer access problems limited participation in the online argumentation implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Limitations (computer problems, internet problems, time) accounted for about 31% of coded opinions, and candidates supported eliminating internet connection problems. → Fettahlıoğlu 2018

Evidence

Fettahlıoğlu 2018

Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Kaleci, D. (2018). Online Argumentation Implementation in the Development of Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2904

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of interview responses; Table 6 lists the limitations theme at 30.77% of statements, split between computer problems and internet problems. The article also reports candidates "strongly supported the elimination of internet connection problems to improve the course".

"In the limitations part of the application, it is identified that teacher candidates have computer and Internet access problems especially out of the university and therefore not all the teacher candidates can always follow the Moodle application, as they want."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.