Moodle-based online argumentation implementation improved critical thinking disposition of science teacher candidates compared with a control group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Post-test critical thinking disposition scores differed significantly between the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group. → Fettahlıoğlu 2018
Evidence¶
Fettahlıoğlu 2018¶
Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Kaleci, D. (2018). Online Argumentation Implementation in the Development of Critical Thinking Disposition. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2904
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test non-equivalent control group study with 22 experimental and 21 control students; independent samples t-test on CCTDI scores. The article reports "a statistically significant difference was identified between their post-test points" favouring the experimental group, with no pre-test difference.
"When the pre -test points were analysed, while no statistically significant difference was identified between the experimental and control groups teacher candidates’ points [t(41)= .42 p>.05], a statistically significant difference was identified between their post-test points[t(41)= 2.69 p<.05] in favour of the experimental group."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Teacher candidates most frequently reported critical thinking among personal-development benefits of the online argumentation implementation — related
- Control group showed no statistically significant pre-test to post-test change in critical thinking disposition — related
- Experimental group's critical thinking disposition improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
- Internet and computer access problems limited participation in the online argumentation implementation — related
- HOTS-oriented teaching improves disposition towards critical thinking subscales including truth-seeking, open-mindedness, self-confidence, and maturity — related
- Descriptive means moved in opposite directions: the treatment group's critical thinking disposition mean rose while the control group's fell — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.