Claims

Viewing captioned instructional videos significantly improves EFL learners' overall language proficiency compared to viewing without captions.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's overall post-MET performance was significantly better than the control group's. → BavaHarji 2014

Evidence

BavaHarji 2014

BavaHarji, M., Alavi, Z. K., & Letchumanan, K. (2014). Captioned Instructional Video: Effects on Content Comprehension, Vocabulary Acquisition and Language Proficiency. English Language Teaching, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n5p1

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the same quasi-experimental study, the captioned group's overall post-MET performance was significantly better, "t = -6.92, p = .000", with the experimental group improving from a pre-MET mean of 67.42 to a post-MET mean of 82.88, compared to 63.10 to 68.12 for the control group.

"The t-test results confirm that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group in the overall performance of the post-MET ( t = -6.92, p = .000)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.