Claims

Viewing instructional videos improves EFL learners' language proficiency regardless of whether captions are present.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Both the experimental and control groups recorded gains in language proficiency from pre-MET to post-MET. → BavaHarji 2014

Evidence

BavaHarji 2014

BavaHarji, M., Alavi, Z. K., & Letchumanan, K. (2014). Captioned Instructional Video: Effects on Content Comprehension, Vocabulary Acquisition and Language Proficiency. English Language Teaching, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n5p1

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The study found that "positive effects of viewing the instructional videos were evident for both groups", with the control group also improving from a pre-MET mean of 63.10 to a post-MET mean of 68.12.

"although positive effects of vi ewing the instructional videos were evident for both groups, the experimental groups’ performance was much better than the control group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.