Claims

In an RCT, women STEM doctoral students who used CareerWISE showed greater knowledge of interpersonal problem solving steps than wait-list controls

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Treatment group members scored higher than wait-list control group members on the APSS Question 1 measure of knowledge of interpersonal problem solving steps, with a medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.508). → Jennifer M. Bekki 2014

Evidence

Jennifer M. Bekki 2014

Jennifer M. Bekki, Bianca L. Bernstein, Natalie Fabert, Natalie Gildar, and Amy Way. (2014). Efficacy of an Online Resource for Teaching Interpersonal Problem Solving Skills to Women Graduate Students in Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076131

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

One-way ANOVA in a randomized controlled trial comparing treatment (N = 64) and wait-list control (N = 64) female STEM doctoral students on APSS Question 1. The article reports a medium effect size, "Cohen's d, 0.508", for Question 1.

"Positive effect sizes (Cohen's d, 0.508 and 0.583 for Questions 1 and 2 respectively) associated with the analysis comparing treatment and wait-list control groups provided additional support for the results."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.