Claims

The Chemistry Achievement Test used showed a KR-20 reliability of 0.78

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The 25-item teacher-made Chemistry Achievement Test yielded a Kuder Richardson 20 coefficient of 0.78. → Okwuduba Emmanuel Nkemakolam; Offiah Francisca Chinelo; Madichie Chinyere Jane 2018

Evidence

Okwuduba Emmanuel Nkemakolam; Offiah Francisca Chinelo; Madichie Chinyere Jane 2018

Okwuduba Emmanuel Nkemakolam; Offiah Francisca Chinelo; Madichie Chinyere Jane (2018). Effect of Computer Simulations on Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Chemistry in Anambra State. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(4): 284-289. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2018.44.284.289

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Instrument-development report: the CAT's content validity was established with a table of specification across knowledge, comprehension and application, and reliability was pilot tested in another zone over one week.

"Reliability of the CAT was established using Kuder Richardson 20 (KR- 20) because the items were dichotomously scored and this yielded a coefficient of 0.78. CAT has a total of 25 multiple choice questions on Gas Laws, State of Matter and Kinetic theories of gases."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.