Claims

The researcher-built two-stage Mixtures Achievement Test showed high reliability in the pilot and research groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The 30-question two-stage multiple-choice MAT (answer plus rationale) had reliability coefficients of 0,875 in the pilot and 0,910 in the research group. → Üce and Ates 2016

Evidence

Üce and Ates 2016

Musa Üce, İsmail Ateş. (2016). Problem-based Learning Method: Secondary Education 10th Grade Chemistry Course Mixtures Topic. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 4, No. 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i12.1939

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Instrument development for the study's achievement measure: a two-stage multiple-choice test of 30 questions checking MNE program acquisitions, expert-validated and piloted on another 25-student 10th-grade class, with printed reliability coefficients of 0,875 and 0,910.

"The test’s reliability co-efficient was calculated as 0,875 for the pilot application and 0,910 for the research group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.