The Basic Technology Achievement Test (BTAT) showed reliability coefficients of 0.84 (KR-21) and 0.88 (KR-20)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2017: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The researcher-developed 25-item multiple-choice BTAT had a reliability coefficient of 0.84 using KR-21 as reported in the methodology section. → Gambari 2014
Evidence¶
Gambari 2014¶
Gambari, I. A., Balogun, S. A., & Alfa, A. S. (2014). Efficacy of Interactive Whiteboard on Psychomotor Skills Achievement of Students in Isometric and Orthographic Projection. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(4), 316-330. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105500
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The BTAT, a researcher-developed instrument of 25 multiple-choice objective test items with five options, was validated by experts and subject teachers. Its reliability was "0.84 using Kuder Richardson (KR-21)".
"Its reliability coefficient was determined as 0.84 using Kuder Richardson (KR-21)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The Chemistry Achievement Test used showed a KR-20 reliability of 0.78 — related
- The Algebra Achievement Test showed acceptable internal consistency and inter-rater reliability in this study — related
- The 60-item grammar post-test showed KR-21 reliability of 0.94 and a moderate criterion-related validity correlation of 0.41 with the Nelson grammar total — related
- The researcher-built two-stage Mixtures Achievement Test showed high reliability in the pilot and research groups — related
- The study's teacher-made tests showed high reliability and criterion validity against NELSON — related
- The 16-item CT–PCK Survey shows internal consistency reliability around .71–.72 and person separation reliability of .69 — related
- The objective-based AI literacy assessment demonstrates psychometric stability with high reliability (KR-20 = 0.862) and approximate unidimensionality — related
- The equal-group tests showed high test-retest and between-group correlations, supporting the reliability of the arithmetical-reasoning marking method. — related
- Students taught isometric and orthographic projection with interactive whiteboard significantly outperformed chalkboard-taught students on psychomotor skills achievement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.