Claims

Students reported cognitive benefits of case-based learning, with CBL2 frequencies higher but time-management problems reported

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 10 of 20 students (50%) said CBL contributed to meaningful learning, and 9 (45%) said learning was more permanent and steered them to research. → İlhan-Beyaztaş and Özdemir 2018 q2 i? 5 students (25%) from the CBL-2 group stated they had problems managing time effectively. → İlhan-Beyaztaş and Özdemir 2018

Evidence

İlhan-Beyaztaş and Özdemir 2018

Dilek İlhan-Beyaztaş, Burhanettin Özdemir. (2018). The Effect of Case-Based Curriculum on Cognitive and Affective Characteristics of Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.3035

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Content analysis of the 20 interviews under the Cognitive Impact theme; 6 of 20 (30%) reported active participation and 5 (25%) improved interpretation skills. Frequencies of the CBL-2 practice were observed to be higher, but 5 (25%) CBL-2 students reported problems in managing time effectively.

"When Table 7 is examined, 10 (50%) of the 20 students expressed that CBL contributed to meaningful learning, and 9 (45%) stated that their learning was more permanent and steered them to research."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.