Claims

The currently curious cluster (CC) showed no self-esteem response to the life skills program

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The currently curious cluster did not respond to the self-esteem measures, consistent with the authors' second hypothesis that consumption groups respond differently. → Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X 2013

Evidence

Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X 2013

Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X. (2013). Drug Prevention by Increasing Self-Esteem: Influence of Teaching Approaches and Gender on Different Consumption Groups. World Journal of Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n1p1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Null finding for the CC cluster (n = 34) in the quasi-experimental intervention study; the results section reports no group effect (Friedman Test, Chi-Square(CC) = 4.412; df = 2; p = .126). Equivalence was not tested.

"The potentially curious cluster (PC) was the biggest consumption group and the only cluster which changed its self-esteem in a pedagogically significant manner. The currently curious cluster (CC) did not respond at all."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.