Claims

PC-cluster self-esteem increased irrespective of the preceding teaching method, though a late change appeared under the teacher-centered method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Self-esteem of the PC cluster increased irrespective of whether the preceding substance-specific lessons were student-centered or teacher-centered; no between-group differences were found. → Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X 2013 q2 i? Contrary to the fourth hypothesis, a self-esteem change occurred in the PC group between T2 and T3 under the teacher-centered method G3PC. → Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X 2013 (2)

Evidence

Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X 2013

Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X. (2013). Drug Prevention by Increasing Self-Esteem: Influence of Teaching Approaches and Gender on Different Consumption Groups. World Journal of Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n1p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Comparison of the three preceding teaching approaches (G1PC student-centered, G2PC student-centered guided, G3PC teacher-centered) within the PC cluster; the results section reports no between-group differences (Kruskal-Wallis Chi-Square(PC-T1) = 0.884; df = 2; p = .643).

"Self-esteem of the potentially curious cluster (PC) was increased, irrespective of the different preceding teaching methods."

Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X 2013 (2)

Heyne Thomas & Bogner Franz X. (2013). Drug Prevention by Increasing Self-Esteem: Influence of Teaching Approaches and Gender on Different Consumption Groups. World Journal of Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n1p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Discussion-section interpretation of an unexpected late self-esteem change under the teacher-centered implementation; the authors suggest the external expert rather than the regular classroom teacher may explain it, citing Tobler and Stratton on external counsellors.

"In addition to the retention-test timeframe effect and in contradiction of our fourth hypothesis, a change occurred in the PC consumption group between the T-2 and T-3 testing schedules under the implementation teacher-centered method G3 PC."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.