Claims

Educational designs bridging school and professional communities were developed based on skill development rather than research processes, content, or results

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The projects showed that CCS educational designs can bridge school and professional communities through skill development rather than the research processes, content, or results that traditionally focus citizen science projects. → Rikke Magnussen 2023

Evidence

Rikke Magnussen 2023

Rikke Magnussen, Yotam Hod. (2023). Bridging communities and schools in Urban development: community and citizen science. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09641-9

q2 · i? · design · r3

Authors' concluding interpretation of the design and observation data from both iterations regarding the professional bridge. The article states it was "possible to develop educational designs bridging school and professional communities based on skill development"; no effect size applies.

"In conclusion, it was possible to develop educational designs bridging school and professional communities based on skill development rather than research pro - cesses, content, or results, which is the traditional focus of CS projects (Harris et al., 2020)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ccs-professional-bridge-skill-development
title Educational designs bridging school and professional communities were developed based on skill development rather than research processes, content, or results
description Educational designs bridging school and professional communities were developed based on skill development rather than research processes, content, or results
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rikke-magnussen-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.