Claims

Most students (71–83%) experienced working more on real-world problems in CCS projects than in everyday school (33–44%), while collaboration showed no significant distinction from everyday schoolwork

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across both DBR iterations, students reported more real-world problem solving in the CCS projects (71–83%) than in everyday school (33–44%). → Rikke Magnussen 2023 q2 i? No significant distinction was found between group work and collaborative practices in everyday schoolwork versus the CCS project in either iteration. → Rikke Magnussen 2023 (2)

Evidence

Rikke Magnussen 2023

Rikke Magnussen, Yotam Hod. (2023). Bridging communities and schools in Urban development: community and citizen science. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09641-9

q2 · i? · design · r2

Pre/post surveys across both iterations compared student perceptions of real-world problem solving in the CCS design versus everyday school. The article prints the percentages 71–83% and 33–44% but no effect size or test statistic.

"The results showed that most students (71–83%) experienced working more with solving real-world problems outside school in CCS projects compared with everyday school teaching (33–44%)."

Rikke Magnussen 2023 (2)

Rikke Magnussen, Yotam Hod. (2023). Bridging communities and schools in Urban development: community and citizen science. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09641-9

q2 · i? · design · r3

Survey findings from both iterations on collaboration practices. The article reports "no signifi - cant distinction" and offers no effect size; it suggests this may reflect how integrated group work already is in Danish primary school.

"In both iterations, the findings showed that no signifi - cant distinction existed between group work and collaborative practices in everyday school- work versus the CCS project"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ccs-real-world-problem-solving-distinct-collaboration-not
title Most students (71–83%) experienced working more on real-world problems in CCS projects than in everyday school (33–44%), while collaboration showed no significant distinction from everyday schoolwork
description Most students (71–83%) experienced working more on real-world problems in CCS projects than in everyday school (33–44%), while collaboration showed no significant distinction from everyday schoolwork
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — rikke-magnussen-2023, rikke-magnussen-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.