Experimental and control groups showed no significant pre-test difference before the intervention¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pre-test scores did not differ significantly between the groups, suggesting equivalent prior knowledge. → Dağdelen and Kosterelioglu 2015
Evidence¶
Dağdelen and Kosterelioglu 2015¶
Orhan Dağdelen, İlker Kösterelioğlu. (2015). Effect of Conceptual Change Texts for Overcoming Misconceptions in “People and Management” Unit. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 99-112. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078838
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Independent samples t-test on PMAT pre-test scores of the two intact 4th grade classes (n= 23 each), means Mexp= 10.00 and Mcontrol= 10.22. No effect size is printed for this comparison; the article says it "may point to the fact that both groups had equivalent levels of prior information".
"Pre-test scores do not show meaningful differences between experimental and control group students ( t(44)= -0.272; p> 0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
- No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
- The experimental and control classes were statistically equivalent before the intervention on prior economics achievement — related
- The control and experimental groups did not differ significantly on the pre-test — related
- Chatbot and search engine classes showed no significant baseline differences in science learning ability and knowledge before the intervention — related
- High and low CT groups showed comparable prior coding knowledge before the AICA intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent in ICT knowledge before the intervention — related
- Before the intervention, experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in written text production — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Experimental and control groups showed no significant difference in numeracy and science achievement at pre-test — related
- The three intact classes were equivalent in prior achievement and scientific attitudes before the light-unit intervention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.