The experimental and control classes were statistically equivalent before the intervention on prior economics achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Normality (0.111 > 0.05) and homogeneity (0.838 > 0.05) tests on end-of-semester scores supported class equivalence. → Desi Anggrianto 2016
Evidence¶
Desi Anggrianto 2016¶
Desi Anggrianto, Madziatul Churiyah, Mohammad Arief. (2016). Improving Critical Thinking Skills Using Learning Model Logan Avenue Problem Solving (LAPS)-Heuristic. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095745
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Equivalence testing on UAS end-of-semester Introduction to Economics and Business scores: experimental class mean 82.38 (n=32), control 82.35 (n=31). Normality was 0.111 and homogeneity 0.838, both above 0.05, so classes were judged "similar so it is worth doing the research."
"The results of the homogeneity test is 0.838> 0.05, which means homogeneous. It can be concluded that the experimental class and control class is similar so it is worth doing the research."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Chatbot and search engine classes showed no significant baseline differences in science learning ability and knowledge before the intervention — related
- No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent in mathematics self-efficacy perceptions before the intervention — related
- The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
- Before treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no significant difference in overall language proficiency — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.