Claims

The experimental and control classes were statistically equivalent before the intervention on prior economics achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Normality (0.111 > 0.05) and homogeneity (0.838 > 0.05) tests on end-of-semester scores supported class equivalence. → Desi Anggrianto 2016

Evidence

Desi Anggrianto 2016

Desi Anggrianto, Madziatul Churiyah, Mohammad Arief. (2016). Improving Critical Thinking Skills Using Learning Model Logan Avenue Problem Solving (LAPS)-Heuristic. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095745

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Equivalence testing on UAS end-of-semester Introduction to Economics and Business scores: experimental class mean 82.38 (n=32), control 82.35 (n=31). Normality was 0.111 and homogeneity 0.838, both above 0.05, so classes were judged "similar so it is worth doing the research."

"The results of the homogeneity test is 0.838> 0.05, which means homogeneous. It can be concluded that the experimental class and control class is similar so it is worth doing the research."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.