Before the intervention, experimental and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in written text production¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pre-test performance did not differ significantly between the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05). → Demény 2012

Evidence¶

Demény 2012¶

Paraschiva Demény. (2012). Developing Written Text Production Competence Using the Reader-Response Method. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Volume 5, Number 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054357

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-test comparison of the two school groups on nine written text production sub-tests; means 7.62 vs 7.35 with "the value of p was 0.56". Equivalence was not tested beyond non-significance.

"The pre-test given to both the experimental and the control group showed no sta tistically measurable, significant difference between the two groups (the experimental group had a pe rformance of 76.2%, the control group 73.5%, the value of p was 0.56, thus p>0.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental and control groups showed no significant pre-test difference before the intervention — a broader claim this one bears on
• Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
• A five-month reader-response-based development program improved third graders' written text production competence relative to a control group — related