Claims

Malaysian undergraduates' overall CCTDI disposition was moderate to positive: 47% positive, 53% ambivalent, none negative

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the overall CCTDI, 88 students (47%) were positively disposed, 101 (53%) ambivalent, and no respondent scored below 210. → Ramasamy 2011

Evidence

Ramasamy 2011

Ramasamy, S. (2011). An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates. Asia e University. https://www.aeu.edu.my

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Composite CCTDI results for the 189-respondent sample, using the interpretive guidelines of positive disposition at 280 and above and ambivalence at 210-279. The overall CCTDI mean was 277.11 (SD 24.39), range 226 to 363.

"Eighty eight students (47%) scored above 280 points, which indicates positive disposition towards critical thinking, 101 (53%) scored between 210 and 280 which indicate ambivalence towards critical thinking. No respondents scored lower than 210, which indicate that there is no significant opposition to critical thinking."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.