Claims

Pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions are generally low, with none scoring high on the CCTDI

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The majority of pre-service teachers scored in the low-scoring group on the CCTDI at pre-test and post-test, and none scored highly. → Temel 2014

Evidence

Temel 2014

Senar Temel. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), Art. #769. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1136398

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive analysis of CCTDI scores (Table 3): 90.90% of the experimental group and 92.59% of the control group fell in the low-scoring group at pre-test, with small shifts to the middle-scoring group at post-test; the article concludes levels are "generally low".

"When the CCTDI pre-test and post-test scores of pre-service teachers in both the experimental group and control group were examined, it was determined that the majority scored lowly and none of them scored highly."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.