Experimental-group students outperformed control-group students on post-test speaking performance after CEA implementation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the post-test of speaking performance (M = 82.733 vs M = 78.833; partial η2 = 0.456). → I Putu Yoga Laksana 2026
Evidence¶
I Putu Yoga Laksana 2026¶
I Putu Yoga Laksana, Ni Made Ratminingsih, Made Hery Santosa & I Putu Indra Kusuma. (2026). Aligning ChatGPT with E-Portfolio Assessment as EFL Learning Model: Its Effect on Student's Speaking Performance and Feedback Literacy. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 8, 103616. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.2026.103616
q3 · i3 · causal · r1
Univariate post-hoc analysis from the quasi-experiment's post-test. The article reports "the experimental group's participants (M = 82.733) outclassed over their control group matching part (M = 78.833)" on post-test speaking performance, scored on fluency, accuracy, and complexity rubrics.
"Table 4 below shows that there was a significant difference in statistical result between the participants' speaking performance scores in the control and experimental groups as F (1) = 48.554, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.456."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Compared with non-ePortfolio peers, students in courses requiring ePortfolios were generally more engaged, earned higher grades, and were more likely to complete and persist, per the 26-institution project evidence — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Experimental-group students outperformed control-group students on post-test feedback literacy after CEA implementation — related
- The CEA learning model has a significant simultaneous effect on EFL students' speaking performance and feedback literacy — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students' feedback literacy experiences during CEA implementation clustered into seven themes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cea-improved-speaking-performance |
title |
Experimental-group students outperformed control-group students on post-test speaking performance after CEA implementation |
description |
Experimental-group students outperformed control-group students on post-test speaking performance after CEA implementation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — i-putu-yoga-laksana-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.