Claims

Improvements in classifying the chemical composition of matter were not durable: some participants reverted to their initial inappropriate classifications 17 months later

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The pre-to-delayed-posttest difference on chemical composition (part c) was not statistically significant (z=1.81, p>0.05), and inappropriate classifications rose from n=2 at posttest to n=13 at delayed posttest. → Yakmaci-Guzel 2013

Evidence

Yakmaci-Guzel 2013

Yakmaci-Guzel, B., & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers' understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(1), 109-130. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008597

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Frequency analysis of inappropriate classifications (Table 8: n=15 pre, n=2 post, n=13 delayed post) plus the non-significant pre-to-delayed test on part c (z=1.81, p>0.05). The article states the change "was not durable" as some participants reverted to initial classifications.

"such change in preservice teachers' understandings of chemical composition of matter was not durable (see Table 8), because 17 months after the instruction, some of the participants who misclassified the given representations with respect to the chemical composition of matter on the pretest reverted back to their initial classifications"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.