Claims

A multiple-representations instruction significantly increased preservice chemistry teachers' scientifically appropriate classifications of particulate drawings from pretest to posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Total scores of scientifically appropriate classifications rose significantly from pre to posttest (z=3.34, p=0.001), as did each of the three aspects of the structure of matter. → Yakmaci-Guzel 2013

Evidence

Yakmaci-Guzel 2013

Yakmaci-Guzel, B., & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers' understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(1), 109-130. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008597

q2 · i? · causal · r1

One-group quasi-experimental study of 19 preservice chemistry teachers using Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests; the article reports "a statistically significant difference between the participants' total pre and total posttest scores (z=3.34, p=0.001)". Part-level tests were also significant (part a z=2.88, p<0.005; part b z=2.77, p<0.01; part c z=2.18, p<0.05).

"there was a statistically significant difference between the participants' total pre and total posttest scores (z=3.34, p=0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.