Claims

The instruction was most effective for the physical states of matter, shifting justifications from macroscopic to submicroscopic evidence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Inappropriate classifications of physical states fell from n=18 at pretest to n=3 at posttest (n=6 at delayed posttest), and justifications shifted to particle arrangement and spacing. → Yakmaci-Guzel 2013

Evidence

Yakmaci-Guzel 2013

Yakmaci-Guzel, B., & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers' understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(1), 109-130. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008597

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Frequency analysis (Table 6) shows states-of-matter misclassifications dropped from 18 to 3 after instruction and 6 at delayed posttest. The article reports many preservice teachers "included submicroscopic level evidence" such as "the distance between particles" in post and delayed posttest justifications.

"The number of scientifically inappropriate classifications for the given particulate representations with respect to their physical states was not high (n=18) before the instruction, and the frequency of scientifically inappropriate classification cases even decreased (n=3) following the instruction"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.