Claims

Module users showed a different response-frequency pattern: more correct responses but also more extreme over- and under-diagnoses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The chi-square test revealed a statistically significant difference in response-class frequencies between test and control groups (p=0.0053), with the test group higher on correct (R) responses and on both extremes (OO and UU). → Tsao and Park 2016

Evidence

Tsao and Park 2016

Ariel Tsao, Sang E. Park. (2016). The Role of Online Learning in Radiographic Diagnosis in Dental Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1387

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Chi-square analysis of response-class frequencies in the pilot assessment of three de-identified FMX cases; Table 2 shows test-group frequencies of 78.2% R, 5.0% OO, 6.2% UU versus control 77.2% R, 4.0% OO, 5.9% UU. The article reports "a statistically significant difference in the frequencies of responses".

"The χ2-test analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the frequencies of responses between the test and control group (p=0.0053)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.