Claims

Accessing the online caries diagnosis module did not significantly improve dental students' radiographic diagnostic accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students who accessed the online module did not perform significantly better on overall correct responses than students who did not, including for incipient caries. → Tsao and Park 2016

Evidence

Tsao and Park 2016

Ariel Tsao, Sang E. Park. (2016). The Role of Online Learning in Radiographic Diagnosis in Dental Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1387

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Observational pilot study of the Class of 2016 (n=31): one-tailed t-tests compared percentage of overall correct responses between test and control groups, completers vs non-completers, and completers vs control; printed p-values were 0.45, 0.47, and 0.43, and 0.49 for incipient caries. The article reports "no statistically significant difference in accuracy"; equivalence was not tested.

"There is no statistically significant difference in accuracy between any of the aforementioned combinations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.