Progression to more adaptive involvement profiles was more likely in the intervention group and digression more likely in the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Chi-square analyses indicated progression was more likely in the intervention group and digression more likely in the control group (χ²[2] = 65.21; p < .0001; φ = .19). → Herman and Reinke 2017 q3 i? Only 7% of control parents in the lower two adaptive classes transitioned to a more adaptive class versus 39% of intervention parents; 2% of control Low/Low parents versus 25% of intervention parents moved to the most adaptive classes. → Herman and Reinke 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Herman and Reinke 2017¶

Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2017). Improving Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement Patterns: Findings From a Group Randomized Trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000169

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Chi-square analysis of Progressors, Stayers, and Digressors in the group randomized trial (Table 3: 304 progressors, 1113 stayers, 389 digressors of 1806 total). The article prints "65.21; p /H11021.0001" and "φ = .19".

"Chi-square analyses indicated that progression was more likely in the intervention group and digression was more likely in the control group ( /H92732[2] /H11005 65.21; p /H11021.0001; /H9272c /H11005.19)."

Herman and Reinke 2017 (2)¶

Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2017). Improving Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement Patterns: Findings From a Group Randomized Trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000169

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Transition analysis comparing intervention and control conditions in the group randomized trial. The article also reports "only 2% of control parents in the Low/Low class at baseline transitioned to the most adaptive classes at follow-up, compared to 25% for the intervention group" and 80% of High/High transitions came from intervention.

"Only 7% of parents for control teachers in the lower two adaptive classes at baseline transitioned to a more adaptive class at follow-up, compared to 39% of parents for intervention teachers who transitioned to a more adaptive class."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Home Learning Environment — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• IY TCM intervention teachers were more likely to rate parents in the most adaptive involvement profiles at follow-up compared to control teachers — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• No significant differences between STAC intervention and control groups in frequency of using the STAC strategies at 30-day follow-up — related
• IY TCM shows no significant effects on disruptive behavior or concentration problems — related
• Module users showed a different response-frequency pattern: more correct responses but also more extreme over- and under-diagnoses — related