CLASP students' expert-like epistemologies (MPEX-II) were statistically unchanged over the quarter, unlike the declines reported for most standard and many reformed physics classes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Administering the MPEX-II to about 600 students in two CLASP A courses in Fall 2008, the favorable fraction changed from 0.46 ± 0.01 to 0.47 ± 0.01 and the unfavorable fraction from 0.27 ± 0.01 to 0.28 ± 0.01 — statistically unchanged, in contrast to national-sample declines even in most reformed classes. → Potter 2012
Evidence¶
Potter 2012¶
Potter, W., Webb, D., West, E., Paul, C., Bowen, M., Weiss, B., Coleman, L., & De Leone, C. (2012). Sixteen years of Collaborative Learning through Active Sense-making in Physics (CLASP) at UC Davis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6970 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1205.6970
q2 · i? · design · r2
MPEX-II survey administered in Fall 2008 to about 600 students in two CLASP A courses, before and after the quarter. The article reports the epistemologies were "statistically unchanged over the course of the quarter"; no effect size is printed.
"favorable fraction of responses changed from 0.46 ± 0.01 to 0.47 ± 0.01 and the unfavorable fraction changed from 0.27 ± 0.01 to 0.28 ± 0.01"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Under the life-science curriculum, MPEX attitudes showed no meaningful change in five of six clusters, avoiding the reality-link decline seen in previous semesters, while the effort cluster declined significantly — related
- Enrollment in the reformed physics sequence rose 61% year-over-year, though the article treats alternative explanations as equally possible — related
- MPEX profiles were similar across both years, indicating the pedagogy and class structure remained consistent when technology was added — related
- Full structural similarity of motivational profiles across time was not supported, indicating profile indicator means changed over the curriculum year — related
- Student attitudes showed little change over a Peer Instruction semester, and course satisfaction dropped in the algebra-based course despite high learning gains — related
- CLASP students achieved an average normalized FCI gain of 0.39, above the traditional-course range and in the middle of the interactive-engagement range, despite only about a third of one quarter on mechanics — related
- Only bioscience graduates who took CLASP (2000-2001) had significantly higher UDGPA than transfer students in their majors, unlike 1993-1994 graduates and non-bioscience majors — related
- Bioscience students who took the CLASP series had statistically significantly higher upper-division GPAs than students who took the traditional Physics 5 series — related
- Students who took the first quarter of CLASP before general chemistry earned significantly higher chemistry grades in all three quarters of the chemistry sequence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
clasp-mpex-epistemologies-unchanged |
title |
CLASP students' expert-like epistemologies (MPEX-II) were statistically unchanged over the quarter, unlike the declines reported for most standard and many reformed physics classes |
description |
CLASP students' expert-like epistemologies (MPEX-II) were statistically unchanged over the quarter, unlike the declines reported for most standard and many reformed physics classes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — potter-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.