Classroom-average mathematics achievement shows no statistically significant association with ASC development when clique achievement is modeled simultaneously¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The classroom-level BFLPE was not statistically significant, and average classroom academic achievement did not predict ASC development. → Tanja Auer 2025
Evidence¶
Tanja Auer 2025¶
Tanja Auer, Marion Reindl, Burkhard Gniewosz. (2025). Is the clique a pond? The big-fish-little-pond effect and the relative meaning of clique and classroom. Learning and Instruction 95 (2025) 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101997
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same three-level longitudinal model as the clique finding; this entry reports the classroom-level BFLPE estimate from the Results section. The printed confidence interval [ 1.615, 0.356] includes zero, so no effect size is claimed; equivalence was not tested.
"At the classroom level, the BFLPE was not statistically significant: b = 0.68, posterior SD = 0.48, 95% CI [ 1.615, 0.356]. Average classroom academic achievement did not predict ASC development."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Self-Concept — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Variance in ASC change is statistically significant at individual, clique, and classroom levels, with a slight average decline in ASC across the school year — related
- Clique-average mathematics achievement negatively predicts the development of adolescents' academic self-concept (a BFLPE at the clique level) — reports the opposite
- Class-average achievement and chosen upward comparisons each make substantial, unique negative contributions to math self-beliefs when modeled simultaneously — reports the opposite
- School-average achievement negatively predicts academic self-concept (BFLPE) and GPA in the comprehensive doubly-latent model — reports the opposite
- Class-average achievement negatively predicts mathematics self-concept after controlling individual achievement (BFLPE replication in TIMSS 2019) — reports the opposite
- Equally able students have lower academic self-concepts in high-average-ability schools (the BFLPE), with a cross-national effect size of 0.49 — reports the opposite
- Class-average achievement shows a small negative indirect effect on subsequent mathematics achievement mediated through mathematics self-concept — reports the opposite
- No statistically significant assimilation effect (BIRGE) of belonging to a higher-achieving clique within the classroom on ASC change — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Equally able students report lower academic self-concepts in high-achieving classrooms than in low-achieving classrooms (the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect) — related
- Schoolmates' achievement (big-fish-little-pond effect) relates only to academic self-concepts, not to labor market beliefs or disengagement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
classroom-achievement-no-significant-asc-effect |
title |
Classroom-average mathematics achievement shows no statistically significant association with ASC development when clique achievement is modeled simultaneously |
description |
Classroom-average mathematics achievement shows no statistically significant association with ASC development when clique achievement is modeled simultaneously |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tanja-auer-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.