Claims

Blind students taught with CLE performed significantly better in Thai language development than traditionally taught students at the .01 level, with one small kindergarten group as an exception

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a comparative study at the Bangkok School for the Blind (2001, kindergarten 2, grade 1, grade 2), CLE students outperformed traditionally taught students in Thai language development at a .01 level of confidence, except one small kindergarten group. → Rattanavich 2015

Evidence

Rattanavich 2015

Rattanavich, S. (2015). Concentrated Language Encounter Approach in Practice for Global Teaching of Literacy: Lighthouse Strategy Implementation. International Education Studies, 8(7), 21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n7p21

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Comparative study with a control group pretest and post-test design at the Bangkok School for the Blind, using a pragmatic test of Thai language use, observation with reliability of 0.80 to 1.00, and t-tests and Chi-Square via SPSS. The article reports CLE students "performed significantly better in Thai language development" at the .01 level; no effect size is printed.

"The findings revealed that (with the exception of one small group in kindergarten) the CLE students performed significantly better in Thai language development than those taught through traditional instruction at a .01 level of confidence."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.