Special Education and ELL students in the clicker group earned better objective and benchmark test scores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Special Education and ELL students in the trial group clearly had better scores on the objective and benchmark tests than their counterparts in the contrast group. → Wang et al. 2014

Evidence¶

Wang et al. 2014¶

Ye Wang, Chia-Jung Chung & Lihua Yang. (2014). Using Clickers to Enhance Student Learning in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 7(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Objective and benchmark test scores of Special Education and ELL students were compared across the two Geometry groups (trial group was 32% ELL, 11% Special Education); the article reports these students "clearly had better scores on these tests". No effect size is printed.

"According to Figures 7 and 8, the Special Education and ELL students in the trial group clearly had better scores on these tests."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• English-Learner Status — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
• Learning Disabilities and Developmental Differences — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it

Related Claims¶

• Clicker-group students scored higher on the 40-question STAR benchmark summative assessment — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Clicker-group students scored consistently higher on all three chapter objective tests in Geometry — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• English language learner students showed no statistically significant gains on either force and motion or California Standards Test outcomes — related