Clicker-group students scored higher on the 40-question STAR benchmark summative assessment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The benchmark test score confirmed that students in the trial group mastered the concepts better than students in the contrast group. → Wang et al. 2014
Evidence¶
Wang et al. 2014¶
Ye Wang, Chia-Jung Chung & Lihua Yang. (2014). Using Clickers to Enhance Student Learning in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 7(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p1
q2 · i? · causal · r1
A 40-question summative assessment built in Exam View covered recall, application, and evaluation across three chapters; the article reports the trial group "mastered the concepts better than the students in the contrast group". No effect size is printed.
"The benchmark test score confirmed that the students in trial group mastered the concepts better than the students in the contrast group ."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Special Education and ELL students in the clicker group earned better objective and benchmark test scores — a broader claim this one bears on
- Clicker-group students scored consistently higher on all three chapter objective tests in Geometry — related
- Classroom quizzing delivered by clickers, computer software, or paper improves student performance on classroom exams in middle school and college courses — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.