School climate data supported changes to the three schools' discipline systems¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All three case study schools used climate data to inform revisions to incident reporting, restorative professional development, and schoolwide behavioral expectations. → Klevan 2024
Evidence¶
Klevan 2024¶
Klevan, S., Leung-Gagné, M., & Nakajima, T. M. (2024). Using data to improve school climate: Insights from three California schools. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/918.411
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Cross-case qualitative finding reported in the executive summary and case chapters, drawn from interviews and document review at Mann, Los Osos, and Scandinavian middle schools. The report suggests climate data were "especially important for informing school efforts to improve disciplinary systems."
"All three schools in this study utilized climate data to inform strategies to improve their discipline systems. These strategies included revisions to incident reporting systems, professional development for teachers focused on restorative classroom management and relationship building, and changes to schoolwide behavioral expectations."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Restorative practices reduce exclusionary discipline and misbehavior and improve school climate, safety, and achievement, though implementation requires sustained investment — related
- Schools that increased restorative practice utilization saw declines in misbehavior, gang membership, victimization, depressive symptoms, and substance abuse, and improvements in GPA and climate — related
- Schools implementing restorative justice report decreases in exclusionary discipline such as suspensions and expulsions — related
- Shifting to restorative practices reduced exclusionary discipline and its racial disparities while improving climate and achievement — related
- Time, funding, competing priorities, culture change, resistance, measurement gaps, and sustainability are the main challenges to implementing RJ in schools — related
- Experts report reduced suspensions and expulsions and improved school climate as RJ implementation successes — related
- Evidence suggests RJ improves school climate, including student connectedness and staff-perceived climate gains — related
- Case-study community schools reported classroom practice shifts—including space arrangement, inclusive curricula, and restorative practices—that they attributed to CSI professional learning — related
- Strategies not linked to a problem behavior's specific context are associated with increases in the occurrence of that behavior — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
climate-data-discipline-system-changes |
title |
School climate data supported changes to the three schools' discipline systems |
description |
School climate data supported changes to the three schools' discipline systems |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — klevan-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.