Claims

Clinical teachers hold four key responsibilities for facilitating clinical reasoning in clinical settings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Clinical teachers are responsible for creating an optimal learning environment, describing the clinical reasoning process, assessing students' abilities, and implementing effective learning techniques and methods. → Cahyaningrum Yeny Dyah 2025

Evidence

Cahyaningrum Yeny Dyah 2025

Cahyaningrum Yeny Dyah, Suhoyo Yoyo, Rahayu Gandes Retno. (2025). Facilitating clinical reasoning for medical students in clinical settings: a scoping review. Korean Journal of Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2025.333

q2 · i? · review · r2

A scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, synthesizing 30 included studies to map facilitator responsibilities. The review states these aspects "include providing an optimal learning environment, describing the process of clinical reasoning, assessing students' abilities, and implementing effective learning techniques and methods."

"These aspects include providing an optimal learning environment, describing the process of clinical reasoning, assessing students' abilities, and implementing effective learning techniques and methods."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.