Claims

Evidence on clinical teaching models is concentrated in high-income settings: most included studies were conducted in the United States and none originated from Africa

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of the 26 included studies, 17 were conducted in the United States and 5 in South Asia, with one each from China, Iraq, the United Kingdom, and Colombia, and no studies from Africa. → Munguiko Clement 2026

Evidence

Munguiko Clement 2026

Munguiko Clement, Masereka Enos Mirembe, Atukwatse Joseph, Smitha Joseph, Kateregga James, Nankinga Clare, Collete Alice Alum, Namujju Josephine, Akello Safina, Nalubega Sylivia. (2026). Clinical teaching models for the instruction of healthcare trainees in the 21st century: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09710-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

Geographical frequency analysis in the scoping review's characteristics of included studies. The review reports "Most studies were conducted in the United States of America (n = 17)" with five from South Asia and one each from four other countries, while "no studies originated from Africa."

"Most studies were conducted in the United States of America (n = 17) [24–37], followed by South Asia (n = 5)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.